This is True® |
Randy Cassingham's Honorary Unsubscribe Recognizes the Unknown, the Forgotten and the Obscure People who Had an Impact on Our Lives |
Copyright 2003-2008 ThisisTrue.Inc, all rights reserved. May not be copied or archived without express, prior, written permission. "This is True" is a registered trademark of ThisisTrue.Inc, Ridgway Colorado. 3733
A Constitutional law professor and lawyer, in 1963 Frank represented Ernesto Miranda for an appeal. Miranda had confessed to a rape charge and was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison. Frank argued that Miranda did not understand his rights under the Constitution and that his confession was coerced by the police. The Supreme Court agreed in 1966 and the "Miranda Rights" were born: police officers must now advise suspects of their rights before questioning -- "You have the right to remain silent," among others. (Miranda himself was retried, convicted, and again sentenced to 20-30 years, and was knifed to death in a bar fight shortly after he was released from prison.) "Miranda was a capstone to a vast cross-cultural pressure," Frank said in 1986, "that led to law enforcement in this country becoming more civilized." He died September 7 in Arizona from a heart attack. He was 84.
From This is True for 8 September 2002
Suggestions for further reading:
Miranda: The Story of Americas Right to Remain Silent
By: Gary L. Stuart
List Price: $17.95
Amazon Price: $14.00
Editorial Review:
One of the most significant Supreme Court cases in U.S. history has its roots in Arizona and is closely tied to the state’s leading legal figures. Miranda has become a household word; now Gary Stuart tells the inside story of this famous case, and with it the legal history of the accused’s right to counsel and silence. Ernesto Miranda was an uneducated Hispanic man arrested in 1963 in connection with a series of sexual assaults, to which he confessed within hours. He was convicted not on the strength of eyewitness testimony or physical evidence but almost entirely because he had incriminated himself without knowing itand without knowing that he didn’t have to. Miranda’s lawyers, John P. Frank and John F. Flynn, were among the most prominent in the state, and their work soon focused the entire country on the issue of their client’s rights. A 1966 Supreme Court decision held that Miranda’s rights had been violated and resulted in the now-famous "Miranda warnings." Stuart personally knows many of the figures involved in Miranda, and here he unravels its complex history, revealing how the defense attorneys created the argument brought before the Court and analyzing the competing societal interests involved in the case. He considers Miranda's aftermathnot only the test cases and ongoing political and legal debate but also what happened to Ernesto Miranda. He then updates the story to the Supreme Court’s 2000 Dickerson decision upholding Miranda and considers its implications for cases in the wake of 9/11 and the rights of suspected terrorists. Interviews with 24 individuals directly concerned with the decisionlawyers, judges, and police officers, as well as suspects, scholars, and ordinary citizensoffer observations on the case’s impact on law enforcement and on the rights of the accused. Ten years after the decision in the case that bears his name, Ernesto Miranda was murdered in a knife fight at a Phoenix bar, and his suspected killer was "Mirandized" before confessing to the crime. Miranda: The Story of America’s Right to Remain Silent considers the legacy of that case and its fate in the twenty-first century as we face new challenges in the criminal justice system.
Reign of Virtue: Mobilizing Gender in Vichy France (Women in Culture and Soci...
By: Miranda Pollard
List Price: $24.00
Amazon Price: $24.00
Editorial Review:
In Reign of Virtue, Miranda Pollard explores the effects of military defeat and Nazi occupation on French articulations of gender in wartime France.
Drawing on governmental archives, historical texts, and propaganda, Pollard explores what most historians have ignored: the many ways in which Vichy's politicians used gendered images of work, family, and sexuality to restore and maintain political and social order. She argues that Vichy wanted to return France to an illustrious and largely mythical past of harmony, where citizens all knew their places and fulfilled their responsibilities, where order prevailed. The National Revolution, according to Pollard, replaced the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity with work, family, and fatherland, making the acceptance of traditional masculine and feminine roles a key priority. Pollard shows how Vichy's policies promoted the family as the most important social unit of a new France and elevated married mothers to a new social status even as their educational, employment, and reproductive rights were strictly curtailed.
Como hablar de sexualidad con los hijos/ How To Speak With Your Children Abou...
By: Ines Miranda
List Price: $10.95
Amazon Price: $9.31
Golota hizo lo correcto.(Andrew Golota, boxeador en una pelea)(TT: Golota did...
By: Tay Polo Miranda
List Price: $5.95
Amazon Price: $5.95
Editorial Review:
This digital document is an article from Semana, published by Spanish Publications, Inc. on October 27, 2000. The length of the article is 808 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Golota hizo lo correcto.(Andrew Golota, boxeador en una pelea)(TT: Golota did the right thing.)(TA: Andrew Golota, boxer hurt in a fight)
Author: Tay Polo Miranda
Publication: Semana (Magazine/Journal)
Date: October 27, 2000
Publisher: Spanish Publications, Inc.
Volume: 6 Issue: 400 Page: 18
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Catholic right gears up for Supreme Court fight: activists reject Gonzalez as...
By: Joe Feuerherd
List Price: $5.95
Amazon Price: $5.95
Editorial Review:
This digital document is an article from National Catholic Reporter, published by Thomson Gale on July 15, 2005. The length of the article is 1316 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Catholic right gears up for Supreme Court fight: activists reject Gonzalez as nominee for reputed tolerance of Roe.(ANALYSIS)
Author: Joe Feuerherd
Publication: National Catholic Reporter (Magazine/Journal)
Date: July 15, 2005
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 41 Issue: 34 Page: 5(1)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
About the HUs
About This is TruePrev: Anthropological Conservationist Carolyn Rose
Next: Chemical engineer Donald L. Campbell